Funny Look-Alikes: Celebs, Famous People, Objects and Animals Matched With Their Long Lost Twins.

Create Your Look-Alikes: Combine two photos (the well-known and the look-alike) on our Look-Alike Builder. You can compare anything, from celebs to animals and objects.

 

« Previous | Next »


Silk Soymilk Bird Totally Looks Like Twitter Bird



silk soymilk bird totally looks like twitter bird

Silk Soymilk Bird Totally Looks Like Twitter Bird

» Think you can do better? Make your own!

Pictures by: dunno source, twitter. Look-Alike by: borkborkbork via Totally Looks Like Builder

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 93 comments

  1. MandaPanda says:

    Hmmm it seems that a lot of things totally look like the Twitter bird…

  2. TheObject says:

    I think the silk bird came first. I know for certain that Silk is much older than Twitter, and any Soy drinkers confirm this?

    • CardinalSmurf says:

      While Silk may be older than Twitter, it does not necessarily mean this logo is. The comparison does have me intrigued, though. To the Google-mobile, Robin!

    • CardinalSmurf says:

      I see no such bird in evidence on a carton of Silk in our refrigerator. Wonder how it’s associated with Silk… The attached image doesn’t give the appearance of a silk-screened print from a carton, but it is a bit fuzzy.

    • appurtenance says:

      The soy milk brand Silk has about ten years on Twitter.

  3. star_gazer_453 says:

    ClipArt, maybe?

  4. CardinalSmurf says:

    Ah ha:

    http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/03/twitter-designe/

    This explains so much (read to the bottom).

  5. Old says:

    Like I said, this is old. I’ve seen this one at least one time before.

  6. MRDR says:

    Getting the hipsters who use Twitter to drink soy milk and giving them something else to gloat to us about.

  7. In Like a LOL says:

    The logo is from an art site, I think the creator got $19 bucks for the twitter bird usage as it is non exclusive

  8. Mark says:

    Ah, the joys of stock. When will companies learn?

  9. Michael says:

    that “logo” is a stock piece of illustration (clip art) from istock.com that anyone can purchase and use for a few dollars.

    • JamJam says:

      Wow, thanks. iStock. Yes, I used to work in graphics at a Fortune 500 and they always used iStock. How absurd. Cute bird, though.

  10. Orlana says:

    Seriously, another Clipart TLL? Research this stuff first, people!

  11. Mickey says:

    sniff sniff I smell a lawsuit

    • Clues for Hire says:

      No, you don’t. It’s licensed stock art. Twitter doesn’t own the exclusive rights to it.

      • You don’t understand the difference between copyright and trademark. Anything that becomes strongly associated with a product or service is material for a trademark even if you don’t own a copyright in the material. Harley-Davidson claims a trademark on its motorcycle’s exhaust roar (personally I think they should be sued for noise pollution but that’s just me and my declining hearing).

    • princess0764 says:

      sniff sniff i smell: neither of those are logos, silk and twitter both bought that same pic from istock photo. neither of them own the rights, the artist does!

  12. FistSim says:

    So, is this an actual Silk logo or not? I can’t find any evidence of this bird being associated with Silk.

  13. Muzition says:

    Wow, they’re identical.

    • Clues for Hire says:

      That’s because they ARE identical. Both are the same piece of stock art, licensed for a few dollars from a stock image site.

  14. Korgulon says:

    Congrats, Russell!

  15. GregC says:

    I’ve never seen this bird on a Silk carton… are we sure this is legit?

  16. fiaspice says:

    for about 10 buck anyone can get this on istockphoto http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-illustration-3412146-eco-sing-song.php

  17. Nick says:

    Twitter and soy milk relley

  18. nubbin says:

    are you people totally incapable of reading previous comments before you post?

  19. Carga says:

    Lol get them running

  20. praise allah says:

    someone posted this one before. The image used is a stock design that anyone can purchase the rights to use.

  21. Gina says:

    I used this bird myself in an advertisement I designed. I hope that was before twitter started using it. It was on iStockphoto so it probably cost $5.

  22. sarah says:

    I call shenanigans.

  23. omary says:

    i guess it is twitter time and must there some websites trying to be 2010 star . we will see

  24. captain obvious says:

    So, OK, apparently the bird has nothing to do with Silk soymilk, but no one’s mentioned the obvious: it doesn’t have anything to do with twitter anymore, either. They replaced it with a different bird.

    So… a graphic that isn’t used on Silk looks like a graphic that isn’t used on Twitter. Amazing.

  25. princess0764 says:

    heh heh that actually isn’t the twitter bird anymore! i just went to twitter srsly go there!

  26. captain obvious says:

    Didn’t I just say that?

  27. Looks like we have a lawsuit on our hands

  28. D Rokk says:

    I would like to formally introduce everyone on totallylookslike.com to the concept of stock art.

    • Richard (with an arr) says:

      You didn’t even *try* to find out if anyone else introduced it (almost all of the comments said this.) Try pressing ctrl+f, then typing “stock” to see if someone (everyone) tried to say it already.

    • Psychaotic says:

      Stock art is something only nitwits would base their world wide branding on. It’s supposed to serve as a base for further work to be done on it, and Twitter apparently just grab-and-slapped this straight from either the Stock Art box…or maybe from Silk Soy’s logo. What idiots.

  29. Jeremy says:

    I noticed that on my Silk the other day….

  30. Fels Naptha says:

    Does soy milk taste like bird sh*t? I’ve never tried either, nor am I a twat (if that means a person who uses twitter). Now I must return to real life.

  31. Smithy says:

    Could easilly be stock art especially the branch

  32. laktario says:

    What is Twitter and How Can I Use It?

  33. Mearna says:

    They are exactly the same but with a different backdrop.

  34. anon0005 says:

    they look nothing alike

  35. Psychaotic says:

    The Silk Soy people could win an infringement lawsuit in a New York minute if they chose to take this to court – down to the little squiggle, the logo is exactly the same except for the colour. I wonder why they haven’t sued yet…

  36. Psychaotic, the reason they haven’t sued yet is because they WOULD LOSE. Silk Soy is a food product. Twitter is a computer service. The trademarks don’t conflict AT ALL, because nobody is stupid enough to think that Twitter is a food product or that Silk Soy is a microblogging web site.

  37. Nathan says:

    AHHH why don’t people read other people’s comments before posting!!!
    They are the same images, they are NOT trademarked, they are both taken from this image from istockphoto (website that sells stock images)
    http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-illustration-3412146-eco-sing-song.php
    Neither of these companies own the rights to this image!!!!
    READ COMMENTS BEFORE POSTING OR THE WORLD WILL END EVEN SOONER THAN WE THOUGHT!!!!

  38. freedfg says:

    it must be doctored the tree is the exact same in both pics

  39. freedfg says:

    actually i just looked it up and silk doesn’t use a bird only twitter does and it faces the other way

  40. Lolingrobot says:

    maybe the twitter bird had a side-job in a soy commercial!!

  41. allie_pocket says:

    uh-oh..i sense a lawsuit coming…

  42. artguy says:

    Let me answer this for you. The reason why that bird looks like the twitter bird is because that bird is for sale as stock on istockphoto.com and was created by a guy named Simonox. Twitter actually only paid 10 bucks for the rights to use it and does not own any copyright to it. The only lawsuit that could come would be for anyone who has used that image without paying Simonox the 10 dollars. Which would be about 10 thousand media corporations that use that image thinking it is the twitter logo… when infact it is not.

  43. Talio17 says:

    OMFG, THEY LOOK EXACTLY FREAKIN ALIKE

  44. RoXe says:

    they are the same!!!!

  45. Chels says:

    It’s probably because they use the same software, no big deal.

  46. asdf says:

    i really hope you didn’t read through all the comments above

  47. chris says:

    i love the twitter bird!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  48. You can certainly see your enthusiasm in the paintings you write. The sector hopes for more passionate writers such as you who are not afraid to say how they believe. All the time follow your heart.

  49. Stock Image says:

    Wow, wonderful weblog layout! How lengthy have you been running a blog for? you made running a blog look easy. The full look of your web site is excellent, let alone the content material!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up