Comments on: Silk Soymilk Bird Totally Looks Like Twitter Bird

By: Stock Image

Stock Image — Sat, 05 Nov 2011 04:46:16 +0000

Wow, wonderful weblog layout! How lengthy have you been running a blog for? you made running a blog look easy. The full look of your web site is excellent, let alone the content material!

By: plotki, celebryci, gwiazdy

plotki, celebryci, gwiazdy — Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:40:22 +0000

You can certainly see your enthusiasm in the paintings you write. The sector hopes for more passionate writers such as you who are not afraid to say how they believe. All the time follow your heart.

By: chris

chris — Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:24:47 +0000

i love the twitter bird!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: dede

dede — Sun, 01 May 2011 08:11:56 +0000

yeag me too

By: asdf

asdf — Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:54:31 +0000

i really hope you didn’t read through all the comments above

By: Jack AfricanAmerican

Jack AfricanAmerican — Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:05:02 +0000

This is not, the greatest milk in the world.
This is a tribute.

By: Chels

Chels — Tue, 05 Oct 2010 01:40:58 +0000

It’s probably because they use the same software, no big deal.

By: RoXe

RoXe — Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:38:33 +0000

they are the same!!!!

By: JamJam

JamJam — Thu, 06 May 2010 00:15:21 +0000

and, like someone said, on the TV spot

By: JamJam

JamJam — Thu, 06 May 2010 00:11:57 +0000

I think it’s only used at Christmas

By: JamJam

JamJam — Thu, 06 May 2010 00:09:54 +0000

Wow, thanks. iStock. Yes, I used to work in graphics at a Fortune 500 and they always used iStock. How absurd. Cute bird, though.

By: Talio17

Talio17 — Tue, 04 May 2010 21:27:52 +0000

OMFG, THEY LOOK EXACTLY FREAKIN ALIKE

By: moonienata

moonienata — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:02:51 +0000

nope

By: artguy

artguy — Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:35:19 +0000

Let me answer this for you. The reason why that bird looks like the twitter bird is because that bird is for sale as stock on istockphoto.com and was created by a guy named Simonox. Twitter actually only paid 10 bucks for the rights to use it and does not own any copyright to it. The only lawsuit that could come would be for anyone who has used that image without paying Simonox the 10 dollars. Which would be about 10 thousand media corporations that use that image thinking it is the twitter logo… when infact it is not.

By: allie_pocket

allie_pocket — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:25:20 +0000

uh-oh..i sense a lawsuit coming…

By: Lolingrobot

Lolingrobot — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:36:09 +0000

maybe the twitter bird had a side-job in a soy commercial!!

By: freedfg

freedfg — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:38:55 +0000

actually i just looked it up and silk doesn’t use a bird only twitter does and it faces the other way

By: freedfg

freedfg — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:29:32 +0000

it must be doctored the tree is the exact same in both pics

By: sumbody

sumbody — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:04:16 +0000

i think u see the silk bird in the commercial.

By: Nathan

Nathan — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:34:14 +0000

AHHH why don’t people read other people’s comments before posting!!!
They are the same images, they are NOT trademarked, they are both taken from this image from istockphoto (website that sells stock images)
http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-illustration-3412146-eco-sing-song.php
Neither of these companies own the rights to this image!!!!
READ COMMENTS BEFORE POSTING OR THE WORLD WILL END EVEN SOONER THAN WE THOUGHT!!!!

By: Turd

Turd — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:16:30 +0000

There you go:
http://1000awesomethings.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/cookies.jpg

By: charles

charles — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:55:35 +0000

is this the actuall twitter bird or not?i cant find any evidence of this being associated with silk….you see how stupid you sound

By: Russell Nelson

Russell Nelson — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:03:38 +0000

Psychaotic, the reason they haven’t sued yet is because they WOULD LOSE. Silk Soy is a food product. Twitter is a computer service. The trademarks don’t conflict AT ALL, because nobody is stupid enough to think that Twitter is a food product or that Silk Soy is a microblogging web site.

By: Psychaotic

Psychaotic — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:16:48 +0000

Does anyone seriously have that much time on their hands?

By: Psychaotic

Psychaotic — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:15:24 +0000

Stock art is something only nitwits would base their world wide branding on. It’s supposed to serve as a base for further work to be done on it, and Twitter apparently just grab-and-slapped this straight from either the Stock Art box…or maybe from Silk Soy’s logo. What idiots.

By: Psychaotic

Psychaotic — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:13:32 +0000

You can’t. You aren’t allowed to.

By: Psychaotic

Psychaotic — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:12:55 +0000

The only difference is the colour. The symbol’s so similar, it strikes me as possibly being totally ripped off!

By: Psychaotic

Psychaotic — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:12:11 +0000

The Silk Soy people could win an infringement lawsuit in a New York minute if they chose to take this to court – down to the little squiggle, the logo is exactly the same except for the colour. I wonder why they haven’t sued yet…

By: anon0005

anon0005 — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:31:08 +0000

they look nothing alike

By: Mearna

Mearna — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 03:32:06 +0000

They are exactly the same but with a different backdrop.

By: laktario

laktario — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:52:41 +0000

What is Twitter and How Can I Use It?

By: appurtenance

appurtenance — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:02:31 +0000

The soy milk brand Silk has about ten years on Twitter.

By: bobsmith

bobsmith — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:03:56 +0000

lol oh yeah

By: Foghorn

Foghorn — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:30:51 +0000

While you’re at it, press Alt-F4 for a more thorough search.

By: Foghorn

Foghorn — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:27:54 +0000

Tribute.

By: Smithy

Smithy — Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:45:00 +0000

Could easilly be stock art especially the branch

By: Fels Naptha

Fels Naptha — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:52:49 +0000

Does soy milk taste like bird sh*t? I’ve never tried either, nor am I a twat (if that means a person who uses twitter). Now I must return to real life.

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:15:17 +0000

I noticed that on my Silk the other day….

By: Richard (with an arr)

Richard (with an arr) — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:34:28 +0000

You didn’t even *try* to find out if anyone else introduced it (almost all of the comments said this.) Try pressing ctrl+f, then typing “stock” to see if someone (everyone) tried to say it already.

By: D Rokk

D Rokk — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:32:20 +0000

I would like to formally introduce everyone on totallylookslike.com to the concept of stock art.

By: Russell Nelson

Russell Nelson — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:48:21 +0000

You don’t understand the difference between copyright and trademark. Anything that becomes strongly associated with a product or service is material for a trademark even if you don’t own a copyright in the material. Harley-Davidson claims a trademark on its motorcycle’s exhaust roar (personally I think they should be sued for noise pollution but that’s just me and my declining hearing).

By: Jamie

Jamie — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:04:17 +0000

haha some common sense for a change.

Nice one Kulbir!

By: Richard (with an arr)

Richard (with an arr) — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 03:56:31 +0000

learn to read comments.

By: librarianchat

librarianchat — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 03:41:45 +0000

Looks like we have a lawsuit on our hands

By: captain obvious

captain obvious — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:22:07 +0000

Yes, but people notice that they go unnoticed.

By: Richard (with an arr)

Richard (with an arr) — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:46:25 +0000

Re-read the entire thread and realize that all comments go unnoticed.

By: captain obvious

captain obvious — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:44:48 +0000

Didn’t I just say that?

By: princess0764

princess0764 — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:39:28 +0000

very true!

By: princess0764

princess0764 — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:38:44 +0000

I second that.

By: princess0764

princess0764 — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:37:49 +0000

nice job!