Comments on: Online Operator Totally Looks Like Anna from IKEA

By: Derp

Derp — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:26:43 +0000

dude….why da hell!?

By: RogerJenkins

RogerJenkins — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:13:38 +0000

I wonder if they took the same peson or if it was a coincidence…

first real one

By: SamIAm

SamIAm — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:59:01 +0000

It’s funny because ginger’s have no soul

By: iluvescookyes

iluvescookyes — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 02:46:01 +0000

I know, right. They look so much alike it’s creepy … and funny at the same time.

By: liv

liv — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:42:35 +0000

does it actually matter?
the point of this picture is to laugh at.
so laugh at it

By: anon

anon — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:43:01 +0000

wow I just laugh till i cried

By: lolingrobot

lolingrobot — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:15:26 +0000

now im confused. :s

By: Avariella

Avariella — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:29:09 +0000

LOL

I’m also in shock about a geniune look alike…..

By: ash

ash — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:42:21 +0000

Maybe all operators stereotypically look like this. I mean, everytime I’m on the phone to an operator an image of Miranda from sex and the city just naturally pops up.

By: Gracie Girl

Gracie Girl — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:24:59 +0000

How the hell is that a fail? Your a failure…

By: Gracie Girl

Gracie Girl — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:22:50 +0000

A mother can’t exactly say ” Oh look! an IKEA woman! Lets have another child that looks like her!” can she? DUUH!

By: Gracie Girl

Gracie Girl — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:21:30 +0000

I don’t understand how all you people could waste your time. Im only doing this because it’s annoying me not doing anything about it.

Anyway they look exactly identical!

By: ernie

ernie — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:30:36 +0000

quite embarassing for ikea. most probably, ikea bought it from a stock images site.

By: Magz

Magz — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:43:04 +0000

The Photo came first, thats really easy to see this is only a Vector image made from it .
Like who can be done in Adobe illustrator.

By: alexh

alexh — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:11:21 +0000

this shouldn’t qualify, because the second image is a vectorization of the first.

By: Roflcopter302

Roflcopter302 — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:52:58 +0000

Look at the face!!!!!
PS:1000th vote was mine(i know Nobody Cares)

By: RJ Lowe

RJ Lowe — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:03:43 +0000

Shirts are different colours.

FAIL.

By: kallan

kallan — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:26:04 +0000

I’m with you beameraw, i just don’t understand…

i don’t think one came before the other.. i think they were born at the same time in two parallel universes. we obviously live in the cartoon one, so Anna was born here and swedish girl was born in the universe parallel to us. But this is just a theory…

By: kallan

kallan — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:19:59 +0000

I’m with you beameraw, i just don’t understand…

By: beameraw

beameraw — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:56:32 +0000

I just don’t understand…

By: Jimera0

Jimera0 — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:29:36 +0000

Clever. Maybe just clever enough to work…

*evil cackle*

By: mememe

mememe — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:15:31 +0000

Obviously the RL woman dressed up like the picture as a homage. Learn to think, people.

By: alaturk

alaturk — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:39:21 +0000

no.

By: Plato

Plato — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:26:20 +0000

I don’t understand why you would want to rant about a rant about a rant about a rant about a rant about a runt…oh bother.

By: oliver

oliver — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 05:20:06 +0000

axel wins. i would like to see what her cartoon hips are like.

By: Gandalfs Beard

Gandalfs Beard — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:49:36 +0000

You’re slipping Queenie .

That should be “white suburban phone-hogging soccer-moms”.

By: Gandalfs Beard

Gandalfs Beard — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:45:09 +0000

Obviously same image rotoscoped in Photoshop.

By: Elisheva

Elisheva — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:20:39 +0000

I don’t understand why you would want to rant about a rant about a rant about a rant about the “Rirst” comment and then type nothing about the images.

By: Leah

Leah — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:18:02 +0000

She also looks like Natalie Teeger from Monk.

By: MoeMoeLove

MoeMoeLove — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:53:32 +0000

why would you want to criticize someone elses comment and not even tyoe anything about the picture?

that is pretty weird that they cartooned her!

By: Andy

Andy — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:38:21 +0000

Bet that one took awhile to come up with

By: Zarggg

Zarggg — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:47:47 +0000

Anna totally played football in high school.

Also, yes. This is backwards. “Anna” was drawn using the stock photo as a reference.

By: Pepe Silvia

Pepe Silvia — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:44:16 +0000

I don’t understand why you would want to rant about a rant about a a “First” comment and then type nothing about the images.

By: Axel

Axel — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:12:57 +0000

And look at those shoulders. They just go on and on and on…. How swedish of her.

By: Queen of the World

Queen of the World — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:01:07 +0000

That is so racist. On behalf of all white women who talk on the telephone, I demand a public apology.

By: Burst

Burst — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:31:27 +0000

I don’t understand why you would want to rant about a comment about a “First” comment and then type nothing about the images.

By: Clues for Hire

Clues for Hire — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:16:58 +0000

The Ikea one looks like it’s a digital painting based directly on the photograph, which is almost certainly stock art. So, yes, they DO look alike. A picture based on another picture tends to look just like the picture it’s based on. Amazing.

By: Jon

Jon — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:50:56 +0000

Hate to point out the obivous, but the two images should be reversed. The actual human being came first. The drawwng TLL the person.

By: Orly?

Orly? — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:39:34 +0000

I don’t understand why you would want to rant about a “First” comment and then type nothing about the images.

By: Huh?

Huh? — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:22:14 +0000

I don’t understand why you would want to be first and then type nothing about the images.

By: in Like a LOL

in Like a LOL — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:49:20 +0000

This opens up limitless possibilities:
1) Take a stock photo or image
2) Photoshop it
3) ???
4) Profit err Totally Looks LIke

By: WangGuantao

WangGuantao — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:46:53 +0000

Good one sir!

By: Not first

Not first — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:19:17 +0000

cool

By: First

First — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:07:57 +0000

First.